Policy Target

Assessment of longterm impacts to guide future funding

Framework graphic with the entry point 'Assess and Measure Long-Term Impacts' highlighted

EVIDENCE-BASED STRATEGY

Long-term cost-effectiveness of initiatives support definition of funding priorities and decision-making regarding allocation of funds (e.g., budgetary expenditures or priorities).

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Availability of reports presenting analysis weighing the costs of investments and potential returns or value to society (e.g., tax base growth)
  • Number/percentage of initiatives using long-term or cost-effectiveness evidence to guide decisions about budget allocation, particularly when considering expenditure reduction
  • Stakeholders’ perceptions on the clarity and sufficiency of information provided in the initiatives’ cost-effectiveness reports to make independent and critical evaluations viable
  • Stakeholders’ perceptions on data transparency (e.g., within organizations and government units)


EVIDENCE-BASED STRATEGY

Government units prioritize the use of simple measures (e.g., rate of return for every dollar investment in the initiative) to assess long-term impacts and to support budget negotiation, including informed decision-making on how much, how long, and where to allocate resources.

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Reports of initiatives contain easy to calculate and interpretable economic metrics of long-term impacts
  • Availability of reports for third parties


Centre for Healthy Communities
School of Public Health
University of Alberta

healthy.communities@ualberta.ca

3-035 Dianne and Irving Kipnes Health
Research Academy
11405 – 87 Avenue
Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 1C9

© Copyright – Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta

Privacy Preference Center