Employment and Working Conditions

Evidence-based strategies about jobs, working conditions, the labour market, access to employment services, work structure, and employee rights.

How to Navigate this Page

Select policy targets and evidence-based strategies that are priorities and achievable within your setting and sector. Align with your mandate, capacity, jurisdictional boundaries, and scope of practice.

Strategies marked with ☔ are important for populations-at-risk.

Entry Point for Action:
Reflects the organization’s or government unit’s sector scope and mandate

Policy Target:
Relates to the initiative’s focus 

Evidence-based Strategies:
Concrete actions to guide initiatives’ design, delivery, and evaluation

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Number/percentage of minimum wage workers
  • Remuneration trends among low-wage workers (e.g., those working in agricultural sector, cleaning services, or hospitality industry)
  • Nominal values of minimum wage(s)
  • Number/percentage of people working in precarious, unsafe work conditions (e.g., disadvantaged groups)
  • Availability of mechanisms to denounce abusive, exploitative work conditions
  • Easy access to mechanisms to denounce abusive, exploitative work conditions
  • Number of enforcement actions over time
  • Number of regular on-site inspections
  • Availability of anonymous surveys for workers about working conditions
  • Availability of anonymized data sharing mechanisms to provide evidence supporting employment stability actions

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Ratio of private sector workers who are members of a union to that of the public sector
  • Level of transparency of public sector compensation packages
  • Trends of non-wage benefits (e.g., coverage) in the private sector
  • Inequalities in non-wage benefits between public and private sector workers

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Proportion of childcare providers supplying affordable, high-quality nonstandard hour care
  • Number/percentage of parents/guardians working nonstandard or unpredictable schedules reporting finding affordable, high-quality childcare services that meet their needs
  • Average number of (un)paid working hours per week, stratified by sex and gender
  • Governments remove welfare requirements that may force recipients to accept seasonal or parttime jobs with unreliable hours and low pay in order to continue to receive benefits.

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Number/percentage of benefits revoked for failure to meet social welfare conditions
  • Poverty levels among beneficiaries’ dependents (e.g., children of unemployed parents/guardians)
  • Percentage of beneficiaries’ children who experience a drop in poverty rates
  • Staff perceptions of the effect of the cessation of obligations on recipients (e.g., stratified by program type)

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Job stability (e.g., for those with precarious working arrangements)
  • Number/percentage of workers who secured full-time employment (e.g., stratified by age or socioeconomic status)
  • Number/percentage of workers who report thriving financially and enjoying economic growth
  • Number/percentage of workers who are overqualified for their jobs (e.g., stratified by race/ethnicity)

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Availability of opportunities for promotion and career advancement (e.g., stratified by sex, gender, sexual orientation, and race/ethnicity)
  • Accommodation of breastfeeding employees’ requirements in workplaces
  • Number/percentage of terminations of employment for failure to perform due to age or disability (i.e., where no legal protections exist)

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Number/percentage of existing programs and benefits that expand their target audiences, including population groups with need who were not previously targeted
  • Availability of new supports and benefits for target groups with high, complex needs
  • Access to income supports (e.g., among workers in precarious employment and working age people out of the labour force)
  • Income security (e.g., among workers in precarious employment and working age people out of the labour force)
  • Self-reported high/low variability of income

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Levels of dependence on supports from government units and organizations
  • Average program receipt duration
  • Multiple, complex disadvantages experienced within and across generations
  • Number/percentage of adults earning their first degree or certification
  • Number/percentage of adults who previously did not have certification or degree transitioning to higher paying jobs
  • Number/percentage of adults who earned their first degree or certification and who feel they can request a salary increase
  • Unemployment rate (e.g., stratified by education)
  • Employment rate in the informal sector (e.g., stratified by race/ethnicity)

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Rate of participation in apprenticeships among eligible people (e.g., stratified by age, sex, and gender)
  • Rates of part-time and full-time employment (e.g., stratified by race/ethnicity, age, sex, and gender)
  • Number/percentage of people feeling they can fully participate in civic and social life
  • Participants’ likelihood of being placed in a job with health insurance benefits

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Number/percentage of staff who feel their programs adjust content and types of education and training whenever needed to better respond to the future knowledge and skills demands of a diversified workforce
  • Number/percentage of affordable or no-cost education and training courses, career planning tools, and other resources that quickly adapt to the latest changes in labour market
  • Qualification mismatch (e.g., stratified by immigration status)

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Generational complex disadvantage
  • Intergenerational transmission of welfare-income
  • Number/percentage of adults who grew up in low-income households who report working in higher paying jobs than their parents
  • Average income of the children when adults compared with income of their parents (e.g., for people with disadvantaged backgrounds)

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Availability of periodic staff training programs on practices about how to be respectful to diversity and inclusive in their day-to-day activities.
  • Number/percentage of staff feeling well-prepared to deal with socioculturally diverse clients
  • Number/percentage of initiatives with promotion of diversity and inclusiveness as part of the organizations’ goals
  • Percentage of applicants for open positions from diverse social backgrounds
  • Ratio of female and non-binary candidates who were selected for a job interview to that of male candidates
  • Trends in promotions awarded to people from diverse and non-diverse social backgrounds
  • Inequalities in retention levels (e.g., based on sex, gender, race/ethnicity, and age)

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Overrepresentation of disadvantaged groups in low-wage service jobs (e.g., workers from Black or Indigenous communities, workers experiencing visible and invisible disabilities, immigrants)
  • Gender parity in senior and middle management positions per country (e.g., in private sector)
  • Women’s earnings as percentage of men’s (e.g., stratified by occupation categories)

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Beneficiaries’ perceptions of the effect of removing obligations
  • Individual’s satisfaction with the support they received to find their way into workforce
  • Rates of temporary suspension of benefits for failure to comply with program requirements
  • Monetary fluctuations in social assistance payments to an individual while in the program

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Number/percentage of people experiencing disabilities who report not feeling obligated to accept low quality and insecure jobs with reduced benefits for fear of losing social support
  • Number/percentage of participants who secure sufficient and sustained employment (e.g., stratified by deprivation level)
  • Number/percentage of staff who believe evaluation of individual labour market prospects are fair and match with people’s work-experience and education
  • Number/percentage of initiatives with instruments and tools in place to capture people’s feedback on the impact of work contingencies on their trajectories to find well-paid, secure jobs
  • Ratio of effectiveness of programs and services with more work contingencies to that of programs and services with less work contingencies in terms of helping people reaching their goals

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Number/percentage of people who report having access to clear and accurate information about the socioeconomic consequences of filing for bankruptcy, such as a reduced credit rating (included in their credit reports for years) and difficulties in obtaining loans, a mortgage, or credit cards
  • People’s reports on their experiences in finding and using free, reliable, and unbiased financial advice (e.g., credit counsellor) to help them navigate their debts and improve their financial situations
  • Bankruptcy rate

SAMPLE INDICATORS

  • Financial attitudes and behaviours (e.g., credit use, spending, and savings) before and after filing for bankruptcy
  • Number/percentage of people who agree their bankruptcy meant a fresh start in life (e.g., stratified by socioeconomic status)
  • Levels of self-reported satisfaction with current financial situation (e.g., stratified by income levels)

Centre for Healthy Communities
School of Public Health
University of Alberta

healthy.communities@ualberta.ca

3-035 Dianne and Irving Kipnes Health
Research Academy
11405 – 87 Avenue
Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 1C9

© Copyright – Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta

Privacy Preference Center