Trust and Power
Evidence-based strategies that address power imbalances and build people’s trust in others and in organizations.
How to Navigate this Page
Select policy targets and evidence-based strategies that are priorities and achievable within your setting and sector. Align with your mandate, capacity, jurisdictional boundaries, and scope of practice.
Strategies marked with ☔ are important for populations-at-risk.
Entry Point for Action:
Reflects the organization’s or government unit’s sector scope and mandate
Policy Target:
Relates to the initiative’s focus
Evidence-based Strategies:
Concrete actions to guide initiatives’ design, delivery, and evaluation
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Number/percentage of innovative and affordable or no-fee banking services and products
- Access to innovative and affordable or no-fee banking services and products
- Number/percentage of underbanked, low-income people who agree with the statement that banking services and products meet their unique needs and short- and long-term goals
- Number/percentage of low-income people with access to no-fee banking services and products
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Levels of dependence on supports from governments and organizations
- Average program receipt duration
- Multiple, complex disadvantages experienced within and across generations
- Number/percentage of adults earning their first degree or certification
- Number/percentage of adults who previously did not have certification or degree transitioning to higher paying jobs
- Number/percentage of adults who earned their first degree or certification and who feel they can request a salary increase
- Unemployment rate (e.g., stratified by education)
- Employment rate in the informal sector (e.g., stratified by race/ethnicity)
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Trends in representation of people of colour (e.g., Indigenous, Latino and Black groups) in the criminal justice system
- Availability of mechanisms and channels to denounce racial biases in policing
- Perceived level of difficult in access and report racially motivated incidents
- Levels of trust in the police in disadvantaged neighbourhoods
- Crime rates in low socioeconomic status neighbourhoods
- Levels of overall wellbeing (e.g., stratified by neighbourhood-level income)
- Public trust
- Level of public support for the anti-discrimination regulation
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Number/percentage of initiatives with mechanisms for (meaningfully) engaging community partners in all phases of the initiatives
- Number/percentage of initiatives with strategies in place encouraging disadvantaged groups to share their lived experience with financial struggles and successes
- Number/percentage of initiatives that prioritize improving community engagement in order to better serve the community
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Number/percentage of caregivers feeling that society acknowledges their work by providing paid leave with no contingencies or conditions
- Levels of self-reported satisfaction with government assistance and paid caregiving services (e.g., stratified by socioeconomic status)
- Financial stress among caregivers (e.g., stratified by age, sex, and gender)
- Number/percentage of initiatives that acknowledge, respect, protect, and incorporate ancestral knowledge and traditions from Indigenous communities
- Number/percentage of Indigenous communities that feel the initiative symbolically values the cultural and environmental work they perform in the community (e.g., in remote communities)
- Distribution of benefits per type of caregivers
ENTRY POINT FOR ACTION
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Individual levels of financial stress due to high debt load
- Number/percentage of people seeking appropriate, reliable support to debt repayment
- Number/percentage of people who report feeling that their debts are easily manageable
- Level of non-mortgage debt before and after program
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Perceived control over financial resources
- Percentage of conditional cash transfers to women (compared to men)
- Social benefits payment to the accounts of people experiencing disabilities
- Self-reported shared responsibility for managing household finances
- Self-reported financial role within household (i.e., dependent, contributor, key financial decision-maker)
- Person responsible for budgeting in the household
ENTRY POINT FOR ACTION
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Number/percentage of participants reporting increased knowledge of topics relevant to their community and life situations
- Participants report on how their gained skills and tools can positively impact their own community
- Prevalence of the outcome of interest among non-participants
- Number/percentage of participants who report their family and friends (i.e., non-participants) also benefited from the positive effects of the initiative
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Levels of perceived trust in the community services and structures
- Level of agreement with the statement that community provides opportunities to build social relationships with other residents
- Individual hopefulness in the future
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Number/percentage of people who report gaining or renewing their sense of control over their financial and life circumstances (e.g., stratified by sex, gender)
- Perception of ability to plan for financial future (e.g., stratified by age, immigration status)
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Satisfaction levels of participants with the amount and quality of support received among participants
- Number/percentage of community members who are motivated to continue participating in targeted programs and in their community more broadly.
- Success rates of initiatives over time
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Number/percentage of initiatives that ensure social participation by people of different socioeconomic groups and identities in decision-making
- Number/percentage of participants from diverse social backgrounds and identities who report seeing themselves represented in the initiatives
- Number/percentage of initiatives that adopted shared language for enhanced communication and collaboration
- Average attendance (e.g., stratified by race/ethnicity)
- Resource usage (e.g., stratified by socioeconomic status)
ENTRY POINT FOR ACTION
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Number/percentage of initiatives integrating policies, programs, and services to best respond to a particular need (e.g., unemployment) through co-location, or using a shared, single application process, etc.
- Number/percentage of initiatives with memorandums or declarations that set out the main responsibilities of the staff members involved in the collaborative work
- Number/percentage of recipients who feel the program has provided support in the areas they most needed
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Number/percentage of pregnant women reporting not being afraid of unsupportive workplace when considering applying for parental leave
- Number/percentage of applications for parental leave (e.g., stratified by occupational categories)
- Approval rate of applications for parental leave (e.g., stratified by occupational categories)
- Number/percentage of parents/guardians who report feeling less afraid of applying for child support due to the risk of incarceration associated with noncompliance with payment obligation
- Participants report on their fears of negative consequences associated with their enrolment in the program (e.g., among people experiencing disabilities or unemployed people)
SAMPLE INDICATORS
- Confidence levels in financial skills
- Confidence levels in financial decision-making
- Perceived ability to pursue financial goals








